🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities allow or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these progressive attacks on freedom have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The latest limitations are being defended by referring to last week's heinous anti-Jewish assault on a British Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"If you cannot draw the line at genocide, you likely cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the rights of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as systematic destruction. Its warfare have prompted the global justice body to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a despicable anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can suggest that demonstrations criticizing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in alleged abuse experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for carrying signs opposing mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our liberties. We may eventually regret how easily we allowed them to be eroded.