🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year backed Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there was some opposition. But no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.