🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."